Whole thing strikes me as a bit bonkers! Boxing should have been banned a long time ago, but there is no reason why a sufficiently skilled and agile female boxer could not win a points victory, providing she can stay away from a knockout punch from her male opponent. But the male will, as it seems many American boxers are trained to, go for the KO and unfortunately is likely to have a better chance of getting it if he can land the punch.

In terms of other sports, there is no reason why things like darts, snooker, pool and so forth should be gender divided. Chess still is, which completely does my head in! Athletics should probably stay divided, as should all contact sports.

There is a pervasive perception that women are interested in men not for the size of their heart or their wedding tackle, but the size of their bank balance. To the many men who believe this, equal pay for women raises a bar they are already having trouble reaching.

Comforting a crying baby is simple. It's crying because it wants/needs something - a feed, a change, a nap or just a cuddle. Find out what the need is and fill it. As you get to know the kid, you'll recognise the different cries it makes for different needs.

Men are simple, women are complex - there are cultural reasons for this that go way back. Now women want men to be as complex as they are, while most blokes just want a simple life. Men and women were never intended to live together- just meet up for reproductive purposes. That's why the human body is designed in a way that facilitates sexual activity with both genders.