Member-only story

Maintain the Monarchy

Si non confectus, non reficiat

Tony Atkinson
5 min readDec 28, 2023
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

His Majesty King Charles III gave his second Christmas address the other day. His mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, would give the address sitting at her desk. She would give a carefully-neutral overview of the year, picking out non-political high points and low points, express sympathy, gratitude and admiration where deemed appropriate, wish one and all a Happy Christmas, and that would be it.

The King did it differently. He spoke standing next to a Christmas tree. A live one which will be replanted when Christmas is over and which was decorated with wooden and paper items that can all be recycled. He spoke with quiet passion about the ideal of service, about the need for us to support and help each other, and to protect and nurture the world. He spoke about the need for mutual respect and understanding between nations and faiths. His speech was intercut with scenes of various members of the Royal Family helping out at food banks, soup kitchens and environmental projects. He spoke about the tragedy of war and the need for peaceful resolutions. He heaped praise on those who give their time selflessly to help others. He exhorted us to do the same, if we could.

It was not a political speech, insamuch as it did not call for political change or support a specific ideology. He was not talking to politicians, but to people. He has spent much of his life doing this; talking to people, bringing them together, getting them to find ways to solve problems. This is a King who believes in the power of people to make changes, to come together in mutual understanding and respect and to make things better. He understands that he has a platform, and that the platform is the only power he has, and he will use it according to the dictates of his conscience.

But that’s just this King, what about the monarchy as a whole. Since the death of the Queen, anti-monarchist types have been making themselves obnoxious by predicting or demanding an end to the monarchy. Why? To what end? What do we replace it with?

We should be a Republic!

Why?

It’s the 21st Century!

Non sequitur. I repeat, why?

Because democracy!

The author made this story available to Medium members only.
If you’re new to Medium, create a new account to read this story on us.

Or, continue in mobile web

Already have an account? Sign in

Tony Atkinson
Tony Atkinson

Written by Tony Atkinson

Snapper-up of unconsidered trifles, walker of paths less travelled by. Writer of fanfiction. Player of games. argonaut57@gmail.com

Responses (21)

Write a response

The Crown (not the King himself) owns huge amounts of land across the UK. These Crown estates are rented out and produce millions in revenue (Net profit for 2022/23 was £442 million). T...

Like so many of your arguments, this is not the win you think it is. It doesn’t matter whether this money came directly from taxes or not. It is rightly public money, and 25% as much as goes to public benefit is given to the King.
One thing I did not…

I think that your defence misses out on certain points. First there is the question of the system of constitutional democracy with the head of state a hereditary monarchy, a question that in its right requires debate. Whether this system of…

As a kiwi, and a subject of King Charles III I wholeheartedly agree.
We. of course, have another "layer" to the monarchy in the form of Governors General, who tend to fit your "retired judges, civil servants,..." mould, though in the past most have…